Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 07:59
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
US Steel workers see hope of job security in deal with Japan’s Nippon - Financial Times
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
35 Father's Day Gifts To Just Give Yourself - BuzzFeed
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Your TRICARE Checklist for Moving - TRICARE Newsroom (.mil)
Just in the last 5 years:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Summer Game Fest Viewership Jumps 89% to Record 50 Million Livestreams - Variety
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
The Best Tech Gifts for Father’s Day 2025 - Gizmodo
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
NYC Renters Brace for Price Hikes After Broker-Fee Ban - Bloomberg
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.